Login

Login
Welcome:
Guest

Search for:


Browse:

Bannner: Aslib individual membership.
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

ISSN: 1472-0701

Online from: 2001

Subject Area: Business Ethics and Law

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Corporate governance: quo vadis?


Document Information:
Title:Corporate governance: quo vadis?
Author(s):E. Isaac Mostovicz, (Based at Northampton Business School, The University of Northampton, Northampton, UK), Nada K. Kakabadse, (Based at Northampton Business School, The University of Northampton, Northampton, UK), Andrew Kakabadse, (Based at Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK)
Citation:E. Isaac Mostovicz, Nada K. Kakabadse, Andrew Kakabadse, (2011) "Corporate governance: quo vadis?", Corporate Governance, Vol. 11 Iss: 5, pp.613 - 626
Keywords:Corporate governance, Governance, Motivation, Principal-agent model, Psychology, Shareholder view, Stakeholder analysis, Stakeholder view
Article type:Conceptual paper
DOI:10.1108/14720701111177019 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

PurposeThis paper aims to examine current research trends into corporate governance and to propose a different dynamic, humanistic approach based on individual purpose, values and psychology.

Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews selected literature to analyse the assumptions behind research into corporate governance and uses a multi-disciplinary body of literature to present a different theoretical approach based at the level of the individual rather than the organisation.

FindingsThe paper shows how the current recommendations of the corporate governance research models could backfire and lead to individual actions that are destructive when implemented in practice. This claim is based on identifying the hidden assumptions behind the principal-agent model in corporate governance, such as the Hobbesian view and the Homo Economicus approach. It argues against the axiomatic view that shareholders are the owners of the company, and it questions the way in which managers are assessed based either on the corporate share price (the shareholder view) or on a confusing set of measures which include more stakeholders (the stakeholder view), and shows how such a yardstick can be demotivating and put the corporation in danger. The paper proposes a humanistic, psychological approach that uses the individual manager as a unit of analysis instead of the corporation and illustrates how such an approach can help to build better governance.

Research limitations/implicationsThe paper's limited scope can only outline a conceptual framework, but does not enter into detailed operationalisation.

Practical implicationsThe paper illustrates the challenges in applying the proposed framework into practice.

Originality/valueThe paper calls for the use of an alternative unit of analysis, the manager, and for a dynamic and humanistic approach which encompasses the entirety of a person's cognition, including emotional and spiritual values, and which is as of yet usually not to be found in the corporate governance literature.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?

- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (113kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list

Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited  |  Copyright information  |  Site policies  |  Cookie information
..